From page 274-275, The Satir Model by Virginia Satir, John Banmen, Jane Gerber and Maria Gomori:
The mandala of the Self describes Satir's holistic concept of the resources that are universal to all human beings. Variations are as many as people, but the basic resources are the same. For Satir, this implied that
"I never have to ask myself when I go anywhere in the world , 'Am I going to find something generic I never found before?' Never. But I am going to find all kinds of variations, and I will always know the core." -- Virginia Satir, 1984, Process Community, Crested Butte, Colorado.
Satir's graphic picture of the mandala comprises eight concentric circles. In the center is the "I am." The "I" represents every human being -- the person, the sacred and holy Self
The eight rings represent the following universal resources:
Using the Satir mandala Nynke created an organisational mandala for quickly building a systems thinking gestalt of an organisation.
The word mandala is Sanskrit for circle, polygon, community and connection. A buddhistic mandala expresses the concept of Buddhism as a "system" drawing. At the center of the Mandala is the "Dainichi Nyorai” (Great Sun), which stands for the highest state. Around the Sun we find lesser "Nyorais" which indicate various teachings of Buddhism. The further we go from the center, the closer we are to the real world.
And as with metaphors, and systems thinking, the greatest value of mandalas lies in their use, and making and perceiving, not in the resulting mandala.
The experiential patterns we have gathered so far for working with mandala architectures (for a more buddhistic perspective please read “Metaphor, Architecture and XP” by David West)
The system domain relates to the one and only mysterious central element in the Satir Mandala, the "I am" part. Its purpose is to Eternally Become.
Put in a only slightly more earthly form, "A system is a configuration of interrelated subsystems that, as a whole, depends on its environment for survival". The system is open to influences and transactions during its existence. The system domain therefore holds interdependent symbols forming an entity from which we can attempt to understand the nature of their collective interactions. The results can help trade off pressures on the involved systems more effectively. And may the Satir Five Freedoms guide our path ...
The product domain can be derived from the spiritual part of the Satir Mandala. It connects the system to the life energy of all stakeholders involved through envisioning "desired state of the system" as best as we can. This tomb provides a container for "wishful thinking" and uniting stakeholder perspectives on what the purpose of the system actually is in crystal ball gazing ...
The resource domain originates in the nutritional part of the Satir Mandala. Its symbols are to help manage for development required inputs. In this domain we can keep track of hard inputs that the system needs and what we require for the development of the system. In a business setting typically technology and tools, money, equipment, and people to do development must be imported from the environment: marketing and sales are required ...
Emotional parts can be considered the "core" of facilitating and more fully human human architecting. Any effect on any living system, collective or individual can be noticed in the cultural domain first. This domain can drive us beyond what we already made meaning of.
From an evolving perspective, issues appearing in this domain are the problems people directly exposed to change are experiencing. Symbols can be used to help make implicit requirements and assumptions explicit and to create spaces in which people can specialize and excel in a chosen field: Ten intelligences. In other words, dealing with things in this domain can help us cope with human and cultural pressures that we need or want to take into account while creating systems.
The networking domain relates to the sensory/sensual part of the Satir Mandala. Its symbols help manage information complexity by categorization and modeling, giving a basis for continued effective interactions. Its symbols represent the (soft) inputs the system needs. In a business setting typically data, requirements and feedback information must be exchanged with others, like peers, customers, clients, users, etc.
In technical systems this domain is the (in)famous components and interfaces architecture. In organizational settings we tend to use orgcharts and role and responsibility or task distribution and coordination systems.
The physical domain inherited its name from the physical part of the Satir Mandala. Its symbols are to help us build explicitly on what is already there. In a business setting it is often (a part of) an organisation or company involving changes to processes that once may have served a purpose and that are now blocking effectiveness. In both cases we wish to keep what works and is reuseful: meet true leadership!
The communication domain can be projected from the interactional part. The purpose of a communication architecture is to provide a conduit system for inputs from and outputs to the environment and between subsystems. Its symbols are to give grounding information for where communication improvements between subsystems are needed and to give clues on how these changes can be implemented effectively.
A domain domain can be derived from the contextual part of the Satir Mandala. From this perspective an (executive) management process can monitor the external and internal environment of a system and track dangerous pressures and problems for serving its purpose. A domain to meditate and contemplate what effects what changes might have ...
Systems thinking has its foundation in the field of system dynamics, founded in 1956 by MIT professor Jay Forrester. Professor Forrester recognized the need for a better way of exploring and testing new ideas about social systems in the mind and studying its possible (side) effects before action.
Systems thinking allows people to make their understanding of a particular social system explicit in order to improve their understanding and to perceive having choices.
A test driven design for manifestation of a more fully human gestalt actually creating for example mystery space ship mockingbird does not necessarily require building and construction metaphors. If the systems we wish to create are to be more fully human, we need to self-organize in more fully humane systems to co-create those systems. Our metaphor could also be something like (links in below bullet items point to Stone Circles):